Need suggestions for 2v2 tourny
Moderator: Do_Checkor
Need suggestions for 2v2 tourny
i need some suggestions on how to do the pairing, letting ppl chose thier team mates, quick anarchy game etc
post ur ideas!
post ur ideas!
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16134
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
If you want it to be something remotely approaching fair try holding a 16 player anarchy for 10-15 minutes. Put the highest scoring player with lowest scoring player, second highest scoring player goes with second lowest scoring player, etc.
Although in the end that will boil down to a contest of who can smoke the other teams noob faster, but the alternative of letting people pick their own partner will likely result in one obvious super team that nobody else could defeat.
Although in the end that will boil down to a contest of who can smoke the other teams noob faster, but the alternative of letting people pick their own partner will likely result in one obvious super team that nobody else could defeat.
- Krom
- DBB Database Master
- Posts: 16134
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 1998 3:01 am
- Location: Camping the energy center. BTW, did you know you can have up to 100 characters in this location box?
- Contact:
Well holding a 1v1 tournament to decide the teams would take far too long to be practical, and people could still bomb that to get a better shot at a good team mate. Not to mention 1v1 is nothing like 2v2 which really does have more in common with anarchy.
You could do something like this I suppose, assuming you had 8 pairs for 16 players total, the top 8 players in the game can pick anyone from the bottom 8 they want, starting with the #1 player. Or you could have it so the best player from the top 8 gets the best player from the bottom 8. Either method gives them incentive to play their best in the anarchy round. Although the players closer to the middle could still try to bomb it for the chance of getting picked by one of the better players/etc.
You could do something like this I suppose, assuming you had 8 pairs for 16 players total, the top 8 players in the game can pick anyone from the bottom 8 they want, starting with the #1 player. Or you could have it so the best player from the top 8 gets the best player from the bottom 8. Either method gives them incentive to play their best in the anarchy round. Although the players closer to the middle could still try to bomb it for the chance of getting picked by one of the better players/etc.
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
Re:
hahaha.Sergeant Thorne wrote:Since when is a tourney about making everything even? Are you all going to hold a session at the end to console each other and share your feelings?Krom wrote:... but the alternative of letting people pick their own partner will likely result in one obvious super team that nobody else could defeat.
why don't YOU be my teammate
you can fly phoenix eh? eh?
- Foil
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4900
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 3:31 pm
- Location: Denver, Colorado, USA
- Contact:
As I mentioned on .com, and Money! said above, make it random, but reserve the right to break up any clearly-too-powerful teams. That worked for me in a couple of 2v2 tourneys I ran last year.
- Sergeant Thorne
- DBB Material Defender
- Posts: 4641
- Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Indiana, U.S.A.
Re:
I'll have you know that I was a decent phoenix pilot in my time!!!Behemoth wrote: hahaha.
why don't YOU be my teammate
you can fly phoenix eh? eh?
I know you're right, Krom, I'm just kidding around.
Actually I'm interested in some of the ideas you guys have. I'm taking some notes for a tournament area in a website I've got on the back-burner.
Just to toss out an idea I had... Might be a little complicated to work out at first, compared to some of the ideas on the table, but what about a limited ship choice for teams that might be considered too strong? In order:
Magnum-AHT,
Black Pyro,
Pyro-GL,
Phoenix
For instance, DT and Behemoth would both be flying phoenix.
Of course the strength of the ships might be subject to some debate. And who wants to be forced to fly a phoenix? Just a thought.
-
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2000 3:01 am
Reasonably fair works fine, i think if we get 4 ringers they should be paired with 4 trainees so to speak.
even though the possibility of player hunting is apparent (as krom mentioned earlier), the TEAMS should use their own discretion on how to combat that.
for instance, if i get some brand new player, i'm not just gonna let the other team bully him, i'd be sticking next to him to conserve our eff.
even though the possibility of player hunting is apparent (as krom mentioned earlier), the TEAMS should use their own discretion on how to combat that.
for instance, if i get some brand new player, i'm not just gonna let the other team bully him, i'd be sticking next to him to conserve our eff.
Re:
Yes. I've watched the Patriots all year. And I'm sure they'll be winning on Sunday. I'll be there, watching that too.Krom wrote:The reason I suggested it should be made somewhat even is because totally stacked tournaments are boring. Would you watch sports on TV if it was totally obvious from the start of the season which team would win?
Seriously though, it isn't even that big of a deal. Zero should just break up any unfair teams. I think we all know we're in this for fun; we know it's okay to lose (unless your behemoth).
Birdseye wrote:It's never over