Windows 7 new OS in the works.
- TigerRaptor
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2000 6:00 am
- Aggressor Prime
- DBB Captain
- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: USA
Re:
Third-party software vendors can do better than that. Microsoft certainly could.Aggressor Prime wrote:All you will have to do, most likely, is set up Windows 7 with the year 2100 in BIOS. Then set the clock back to normal time. That way, you won't have to worry until 2101.
- TigerRaptor
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2588
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2000 6:00 am
Re:
"Resistance is futile. Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us" - Microsoft.Kyouryuu wrote:And I thought it was absurd for anti-virus companies to charge a yearly fee. That's just absurd. If Microsoft goes to a subscription model, they can count me out of updating to their OS.
Re:
You're awfully silly.Aggressor Prime wrote:All you will have to do, most likely, is set up Windows 7 with the year 2100 in BIOS. Then set the clock back to normal time. That way, you won't have to worry until 2101.
- FunkyStickman
- DBB Ace
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: 'Nawlins
Re:
You mean getting out of the personal PC market to concentrate on mainframes, software services, hardware design and research?Duper wrote:I get the feeling they will be going the way of IBM soon. ... well maybe a bit less than soon.
.er.. what do you call that?
- SirWinner
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2700
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
- Contact:
If I could give feedback that Macrosoft er Microsoft would actually read:
---
From Windows Users and Computer Programmers all over the world...
Dear Mr. Bill Gates a/k/a Mr. Microsoft, et al:
Please FIX Windows Vista so that programs that worked properly in Windows XP (and previous versions) will still work in Vista.
Forced version upgrades, while interesting, don't address the issues that need to be fixed before pushing out another very buggy version Windows!
Fix the major timing issues that persist even in the NEWER versions of Windows also! (Optimize your compiled C Code using well placed and well rewritten Assembly Code!)
Geez!
---
We have many software programs that we have written that literally have \"rights\" issues using \"Standard\" Windows Calls in Windows Vista! DOH!
For example, one function that counts how many copies of my software that is running in the same PC crashes the program. Yet in Windows XP, this function works correctly.
The function lets the program to determine that if MORE than one copy of the same program is running, to cleanly exit itself to prevent sharing and other issues if 2 or more copies of it are running. I also use this to find out if a program that needs to get launched is or isn't already running.
Throwing \"More Processor Power and More Processor Memory\" at the Windows Timing issues do not resolve those issues!
Wheeeeeee!
SirWinner
---
From Windows Users and Computer Programmers all over the world...
Dear Mr. Bill Gates a/k/a Mr. Microsoft, et al:
Please FIX Windows Vista so that programs that worked properly in Windows XP (and previous versions) will still work in Vista.
Forced version upgrades, while interesting, don't address the issues that need to be fixed before pushing out another very buggy version Windows!
Fix the major timing issues that persist even in the NEWER versions of Windows also! (Optimize your compiled C Code using well placed and well rewritten Assembly Code!)
Geez!
---
We have many software programs that we have written that literally have \"rights\" issues using \"Standard\" Windows Calls in Windows Vista! DOH!
For example, one function that counts how many copies of my software that is running in the same PC crashes the program. Yet in Windows XP, this function works correctly.
The function lets the program to determine that if MORE than one copy of the same program is running, to cleanly exit itself to prevent sharing and other issues if 2 or more copies of it are running. I also use this to find out if a program that needs to get launched is or isn't already running.
Throwing \"More Processor Power and More Processor Memory\" at the Windows Timing issues do not resolve those issues!
Wheeeeeee!
SirWinner
Re:
Optimize? Microsoft?SirWinner wrote:(Optimize your compiled C Code using well placed and well rewritten Assembly Code!)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! Oh god thats a good one. Optimize is a dirty word at M$.
I bet the heads of the software engineers would explode upon seeing assembly code.
- SirWinner
- DBB Fleet Admiral
- Posts: 2700
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States of America
- Contact:
Meant that as a joke... Microsoft seems to have forgotten their roots when it comes to writing software.Optimize? Microsoft?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! Oh god thats a good one. Optimize is a dirty word at M$.
I bet the heads of the software engineers would explode upon seeing assembly code.
Before they became the giant that they are today, they USED to use a LOT of assembly language.
The old versions of Basic before the various basic compilers used assembly code to keep the code small and a lot more efficient. Same went for the various versions of MS-DOS.
The other thing that Microsoft seems to forget is that not ALL programmers use C/C++/C# to write world class software using Visual Studio's compilers. So they only seem to show C examples in the last few years for DirectX calls, and the various Software Development Kits (SDK's), etc.
Oh well, the midget that became a giant forgot their roots.
Therefore the classic \"Microsoft Model of Software Releases\" came into being... In other words, release software BEFORE it is truly ready for prime time then make the end-users suffer until they finally get to service pack 2 (SP2) or beyond before the software is close to what it SHOULD have been. Then about that time we get to deal with the NEW version of windows that still isn't ready to go when released.
They seem to do the same of the games that they release.
I remember how poorly the Net Code worked in Mech Warrior 4. If someone entered or exited a game after the game was launched, the game lagged so bad that even on a leading edge PC all you would see was a slideshow until the person was fully entered into battle or exited from the battle.
Typical Microsoft.
Wishful thinking, I know.